Conquer Medical Coding Audits: Top Errors & How to Avoid Them



Ever feel a twinge of anxiety when you see “audit” in your inbox? Relax, coder friends! Audits are a crucial part of keeping your coding secure, efficient, and well-documented. They help identify areas for improvement and catch potential mistakes before they snowball.

This newsletter dives into the world of medical coding audits, unpacking common errors and offering practical tips to avoid them.

Understanding Medical Coding Audits

Medical coding audits are essentially reviews of medical records and their corresponding codes. The goal? To ensure accuracy and compliance with coding guidelines. These audits can be conducted internally by your healthcare facility or externally by insurance companies, government agencies, or third-party reviewers.

The focus is on making sure documented services match the billed codes. This includes reflecting the severity of the illness, the level of care provided, and the medical necessity of procedures.

Top Medical Coding Errors to Watch Out For

  • Upcoding and Downcoding: This is all about choosing the wrong code. Upcoding happens when you intentionally pick a higher-value code to inflate reimbursement. Downcoding is the opposite, where you underestimate the complexity and pick a lower-value code, leading to lost revenue. Both can have serious consequences, with upcoding potentially leading to fraud allegations and downcoding causing financial losses.
  • Incomplete Documentation: Missing or unclear documentation that doesn’t support the billed codes is a big no-no. Medical records need to clearly detail the services provided, the patient’s condition, and why the procedures were medically necessary.
  • Unbundling: This one involves billing separate procedures individually when they should be bundled together as a single code. This leads to getting paid more than allowed.
  • Modifier Mishaps: Using modifiers incorrectly, like adding one to a code without proper documentation, can lead to claim denials or trigger audits.
  • Lack of Specificity: Using generic diagnosis codes when specific ones are available can result in claim denials or improper payments.
  • Duplicate Billing: Billing for the same service or procedure multiple times within a single visit or across different providers is a common error that can lead to audits.

By staying on top of these common pitfalls, you can ensure your coding is accurate, compliant, and keeps those audit emails feeling more like a gentle breeze than a hurricane.

https://www.allzonems.com/medical-coding-audits-and-avoid-errors

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2023 Scary ICD-10 Halloween codes For Physician

Image
  With Halloween right around the corner, be on the lookout for some of these incidents that may require new ICD-10 codes. ICD-10 CM Code W49.01 – HAIR CAUSING EXTERNAL CONSTRICTION W49 . 01XA  is a billable ICD  code  used to specify a diagnosis of hair causing external constriction, initial encounter. A ‘billable code’ is detailed enough to be used to specify a medical diagnosis. ICD-10 CM Code X99.2 – ASSAULT BY SWORD OR DAGGER X99.2 is a non-billable ICD-10 code for  Assault by sword or dagger . It should not be used for HIPAA-covered transactions as a more specific code is available to choose from below. More specific codes – 7th Character selection: The appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category X99 Use X99.2XXA for initial encounter Use X99.2XXD for subsequent encounter Use X99.2XXS for sequela ICD-10 CM Code R44.1 – Visual Hallucinations R44.1  is a billable ICD code used to specify a diagnosis of visual hallucinations. A ‘billable code’ is detailed eno
Read more

Medical Coding Strategies to Prevent Payer Denials

  As a former emergency department physician from the U.K., this individual was well aware of claim denials and rejections, with payers frequently withholding or reducing payments. However, it was only when his personal insurance company, denied his medical claim for a vitamin D test that he decided to delve deeper into the issue. He found it challenging to comprehend how Cigna could make such a decision when the physician reviewer had limited knowledge about his medical history. The individual had been experiencing severe pain in his hips and acetabulum, with his physician suspecting a vitamin D deficiency. Following the payer’s instructions, he appealed the denial, but unfortunately, health insurance upheld its initial decision. It was only after seeking an independent external review that finally reversed the denial. The external reviewer concluded that the test was medically necessary, considering the severity of the bone pain and the risk of bone fracture without vitamin D supplem
Read more

Medicare ASC Payment System 2024 Update: New HCPCS Codes & Changes

Image
  Get ready for new codes , updated categories , and a few surprises : Pass-through power:  Five new devices (C1600-C1603) join the pass-through party, while some old friends (C1825, C1052, etc.) say goodbye. Remember to use the January 2024 ASC code pair file for billing. Biology guides the beam:  A new code (C9794) shines a light on radiation therapy guided by biology, including PET and CT scans. Dentists get dialed in:  104 new dental codes (CDT) are now accepted in the ASC system, with special indicators for ancillary services and non-office procedures. Don't forget code G0330 for facility fees on dental rehab, but keep it separate from medical billing  charges. In short, there's plenty to keep you busy in the new year!  This update gives you more options for billing various procedures and devices, so be sure to brush up on the details to ensure smooth sailing with Medicare. Key changes: More engaging and accessible tone. Replaced technical jargon with plain language. Used
Read more